La Chine pourrait avoir commencé à produire en série un nouvel avion radar appelé KJ-3000. Des images satellites montrent que plusieurs de ces avions étaient stationnés dans une usine en avril. Si ces avions sont mis en service, ils aideraient l'armée chinoise à détecter des menaces, suivre des cibles et coordonner des opérations aériennes, notamment dans le cadre d'un conflit potentiel autour de Taïwan.
Ces avions sont basés sur un modèle de transport déjà existant, le Y-20B, ce qui permet à la Chine d'avoir plus de contrôle sur leur production. Le KJ-3000 pourrait remplacer un ancien modèle, le KJ-2000, qui était limité en nombre à seulement quatre unités.
Bien que des experts croient que la production a commencé, il n'y a pas encore de confirmation officielle que ces avions soient déjà opérationnels. Ils pourraient améliorer les capacités militaires de la Chine dans la région du Pacifique, notamment en fournissant des informations précieuses pour les opérations navales. Toutefois, il'entrée réelle en service actif de ces appareils reste incertaine.
Satellite imagery hints at KJ-3000 production, which could boost target detection and tracking in the western Pacific.
The KJ-3000 could help the People’s Liberation Army detect threats, track targets and coordinate air operations. Photo: Handout
China may have begun limited production of its next-generation KJ-3000 airborne early warning aircraft, with satellite imagery suggesting that three possible production examples were already parked at a factory as early as April, according to an imagery analyst.
If brought into service, the aircraft could help the People’s Liberation Army to detect threats, track targets and coordinate air operations across the western Pacific, including during a potential conflict over Taiwan involving US and allied forces.
Satellite imagery captured on October 5 by US geospatial intelligence company Vantor showed four KJ-3000s at the Xian-Yanliang aviation complex in the country’s northwestern Shaanxi province, US defence media outlet TWZ reported last week.
Three were parked near the Xian Aircraft Industrial Corporation (XAIC) factory and one prototype was parked at the neighbouring China Flight Test Establishment.
Defence intelligence publisher Janes reported on May 15 that satellite imagery showed a fifth KJ-3000 airframe at Xian-Yanliang in April.
An imagery analyst who requested anonymity said three of the five lacked the 78XX serial numbers carried by the two prototypes – the 7821 and 7822 – and could belong to an initial production batch.
The three planes spotted at the factory appeared to have remained since April in an XAIC area normally used by aircraft awaiting delivery, rather than moving to the flight-test ramp, he said.
The analyst questioned why China would need three additional prototypes when the KJ-3000 used the established Y-20B transport airframe. “They don’t need a tonne of prototypes when all they’re really testing are the systems as the airframe itself is mature,” he said.
While prototype 7821 was absent from the October imagery, he said he had seen no evidence of KJ-3000s at operational PLA Air Force bases. The photographs therefore do not establish that deliveries have begun.
Andreas Rupprecht, a specialist in Chinese military aviation, said factory-fresh aircraft usually remained at XAIC for months before delivery in batches, possibly while units prepared to receive them. Some could be awaiting additional systems, but the imagery could not establish why they had remained there.
TWZ reported that J. Michael Dahm, a senior fellow at the US-based Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, believed serial production had started, but the media outlet cautioned that the imagery alone could not confirm this.
The KJ-3000 could eventually replace China’s KJ-2000, a radar aircraft built on Russian-made Il-76 transports that was introduced around two decades ago. Only four KJ-2000s were produced, which TWZ attributed to a shortage of suitable airframes. The KJ-3000 instead uses the domestically produced Y-20B airframe and Chinese-made WS-20 engines, giving Beijing greater control over production and upgrades.
But Rupprecht argued that the KJ-2000’s specialised strategic role, not Il-76 shortages, mainly explained why only four were built. China could have converted more Il-76s if needed, he said, but the large aircraft primarily served as command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance nodes, while smaller KJ-500s handled most tactical airborne early warning missions.
He expected the KJ-3000 to serve as a similar node. For operations around Taiwan, further into the western Pacific and towards India, using the KJ-3000 would represent “a quantum leap in terms of being much more modern”, he said. Given the limited number possibly needed, he did not expect significant competition for production capacity with Y-20 transports and tankers.
Janes reported in 2025 that markings on the prototype KJ-3000’s radar dome suggested two back-to-back antenna arrays, although its configuration and performance remain unconfirmed. A refuelling probe could extend its time in the air on operations. The Pentagon assessed in December 2025 that the aircraft would probably use digital radar with anti-jamming, passive-detection and target-identification capabilities.
The KJ-3000’s potential military value extends beyond warning of approaching aircraft. In May 2025, Chinese state television reported that the Type 055 destroyer Lhasa had used data from an early warning aircraft to extend its detection range and engage targets without relying solely on the ship’s own radars. While the aircraft was not identified as a KJ-3000, the example illustrated how airborne sensors could extend naval strike capabilities.
An April Mitchell Institute report, based on a war game of a hypothetical Taiwan conflict in 2035, identified KJ-3000s and KJ-500s as high-value targets because of their role in PLA long-range targeting.
While the satellite imagery suggests KJ-3000 production may have begun, when the aircraft will enter operational service remains unclear.
By Gabriel Dominguez
Sections: News / China / Military | Topics: China's military weapons, Taiwan, China, The Pentagon (US Department of Defence)
Short link: https://sc.mp/p7jy6
Read the original article on SCMP
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire
Merci pour votre intérêt pour Cocardes !